Skip to main content
Data that informs improvement

Data that informs improvement

Baseline and endline evaluations, real-time evaluation, facilitated self-assessment processes, gender audits, learning agendas, and the co-development of monitoring frameworks. Our methodologies include outcome harvesting, Most Significant Change, case studies, peer review, and other participatory and evidence-based approaches. We promote the meaningful use of data to strengthen programmes, learning, accountability, and policy development.

Scroll

What's included

Baseline/Endline

We conduct baseline, needs, and endline assessments using rigorous and participatory methods to measure impact, understand communities, and strengthen programmes in complex contexts.

Mid-term and Final Evaluation

We deliver participatory evaluations aligned with OECD guidelines, helping organisations measure impact and improve through rigorous, gender-transformative qualitative and quantitative methods.

Accessibility Assessment

We assess and remediate website and publication´s accessibility for people with disabilities through audits, tailored action plans, and technical adjustments.

Real-time Evaluations

Real-time evaluations provide timely feedback during humanitarian responses, ensuring adaptive learning, inclusive participation, and actionable recommendations throughout implementation.

Self-assessment Processes

We design and facilitate participatory self-assessment processes that foster ownership, reduce power imbalances, and generate actionable improvement plans through rigorous methodologies.

Gender Audits

We support organisations in assessing how effectively they promote gender transformation by examining internal practices, leadership, policies, and programmes.

Common questions

Yes. Our team offers multiple approaches, including peer review methodologies, to ensure that communities meaningfully shape the design and implementation of evaluation processes.

We fully understand the need to adapt evaluation processes in humanitarian and crisis-affected contexts. In these settings, the priority must always be the safety, dignity, and basic needs of affected populations. Our team works closely with clients and communities to identify realistic, context-sensitive approaches that safeguard participants while still generating meaningful insights and opportunities for learning and improvement.

Yes. Our team brings experience in impact assessment and evaluation, including the design and implementation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), alongside qualitative and participatory methodologies that help capture complex and long-term change.

Ready to get started?
Tell us about your project and we'll get back to you with a tailored quote within 24 hours.